Recently Updated Toyota Lawsuits
Many of these are class-action suits that look to cover a group of owners in a particular area. Click on the lawsuit for more information and to see if you're eligible to receive any potential settlements.
Adam B. Lawler Law Firm, LLC, et al., v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., et al.
3:21-CV-00354Case Filed
A Toyota Bluetooth echo class action lawsuit has been filed by an Illinois law firm which alleges the hands-free phone systems are defective in multiple Toyota models that were not initially equipped with Apple CarPlay and have not had a head unit replaced by Toyota.
Murphy, v. Toyota Motor Corporation, et al.
Case Filed
The plaintiffs allege a battery defect causes RAV4 to lose electrical power, stall and catch fire. The class action lawsuit says the 2013-2018 SUVs have defects in the 12-volt B+ terminals which suffer electrical shorts to the frames that hold down the batteries.
Freeman, et al., v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al.
Case Filed
Toyota Bluetooth echo problems have caused a class action lawsuit that alleges when the driver of the Toyota uses the hands-free phone system to make or receive a call, the person on the other end of the call hears an echo of their own words.
Gary Weinreich, et al., v. Toyota Motor Sales, et al.
Case Filed
According to the 4Runner proposed class-action lawsuit, the SUVs suffer from the same lack of anti-rust protection as the trucks included in a 2016 settlement for other Toyota vehicles.
Stockinger, et al., v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Case Filed
A Toyota air conditioner smell lawsuit alleges numerous Toyota and Lexus models build up mold on the evaporators and send musty moldy odors into the vehicles.
Dismissed Albert Heber v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., et al.
Dismissed
According to the plaintiffs, Toyota switched to soybean coated wires in various cars, vans, SUVs and trucks, but the wiring is allegedly defective because it attracts rats and other rodents. Once chewed, the damaged wiring can cause all kinds of vehicle functions to fail, allegedly creating a safety hazard.
Brian Warner, et al. v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc.
Case Filed
The lawsuit alleges the truck frames rust prematurely because they weren't properly protected with anti-rust chemicals at the factory, leaving the frames too naked against salt water and other elements that corrode the frames.
Heidi Browder vs. Toyota Motor Corporation, et al.
Case Filed
The soy-based wiring lawsuit alleges Toyota skipped using plastic or glass-based insulation in place of soy, which is allegedly better for the environment.
Salas, et al., v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. Inc., et al.
Case Filed
The plaintiffs claim the evaporator allows mold to grow and creates a hazard to occupants. The evaporator, used with the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system, allegedly collects moisture due to condensation as it absorbs heat from the passenger compartment.
Wendy George v. Toyota Motor Corp., et al.
Case Filed
A Toyota sticky dashboard lawsuit alleges Toyota made empty promises with a dashboard warranty program that was created after two class-action lawsuits were filed in 2014.
Strama vs. Toyota Motor Sales, Inc.
Case Filed
A Toyota RAV4 oil consumption lawsuit alleges RAV4 owners must constantly spend money on oil due to a defect in the engine. The plaintiffs claim 2006-2008 Toyota RAV4 SUVs have engines that consume 1-quart of oil every 1,200 mile, a problem that grows worst as the vehicles get older.
Roscoe v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc.
Case Filed
A Toyota soy wiring class-action lawsuit alleges rats, mice, squirrels and other animals are enticed to chew the wires that causes damage to all kinds of electrical components, leaving Toyota owners to pay thousands for repairs.